my question is the same question I have for apple and the rest of the R and D specialists this is like the MODEL T FORD of AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES so why not leave it in R an D for another 30 years and eschew the minimal finances it can generate you but really spend R and D capital mastering this vehicle design is it clearly a valid vehicle design ? who refuels it? nothing the future is here but should the future wait for 6 more design cycles before the vehicle reaches the public instead of going public with MODEL T go public with Ferrari Roadster? does that make sense dwell in R and D longer? just like Apple releasing the LISA or the MAC compute before the iMac like only release a major product not a minor product that needs more R and D so that we don’t experience inferior vehicles and products in the market place at any time eschew that concept of seeing what they’ll buy and only sell what you know is an R and D win?????????????
Leave a Reply